NEWS

update:2012-10-15NO.: DOC121002-01

LEO-MTS Got Satisfactory Results in Participating the LGC toy physical proficiency testing scheme

LGC toy safety proficiency testing scheme (TOYTEST) Round 51 (September 2012 ) - ASTM F963 - 11 and EN 71-1:2011" Magnet flux testing" individual test, was organized by the authority of the notified body LGC (UK Laboratory of the Government Chemist) in the United Kingdom. The plan is required to give accurate testing data based on the specified magnet sample. The main purpose of this scheme is to monitor and inspect laboratories in the accuracy of the test results data processing. LEO- MTS Toy Physical Laboratory participated in this scheme and got satisfactory results.

In this international proficiency testing scheme, 50 laboratories from around the world participated in the magnet flux testing, 50 for EN 71-1:2011 and 24 for ASTM F963-11. LEO-MTS whose code number is TY0186 participated in this two standards testing and got satisfactory results.

Through this international toy physics laboratory proficiency testing program, not only the level of detection capability of the LEO- MTS was tested, and it also provided a solid foundation for the CPSC accreditation and CNAS assessment in the future. We are committed to provide customers with impartial and accurate test results, true and reliable data.

Please click the below Leo-MTS (TY0186) test result report for detail information:
LGC Round 51Report.pdf
IndividualReport51.pdf

Solution
My Profession Your Excellence!
• Heshan Leo Metrology and Testing Services Co. Ltd.(LEO-MTS) can help to improve products quality for you, your supplier and your client.
To more information, please contact
Heshan Leo Metrology and Testing Services Co. Ltd.

86 750- 8862659(Cindy Chan)
86 750- 8862659(Kelly Wong)
86 750-8862565(Mr. Liu)

86 750-8768244

MTS@Leo-MTS.com

http://www.leo-mts.com http://www.leo-mts.cn

more info
Copyright © 2011 HESHAN LEO METROLOGY AND TESTING SERVICES CO.LTD. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer:Leo-MTS has tried all reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of information, however the information provided should not be relied upon as legal advice or regarded as a substitute for legal advice; The reader should exercise his own care and judgment before replying on this information in any important matter.